
Many online stores copy their returns page from another shop, and many still carry the line “No refund, no exchange”. That line is risky. Any refund policy in Malaysia sits on top of rules you cannot write away, and the online rules got stricter at the end of 2024.
This guide covers what the law requires and what is up to you. It is the refund-specific companion to our guide on website terms and conditions for Malaysian SMEs. It comes from ZenWeb, a Malaysian Google Partner agency with 500+ clients that builds online stores. We are a web and marketing agency, not a law firm; every rule below is taken from the official text as at October 2026.
This post is general information, not legal or tax advice. Please confirm your own position with a licensed lawyer or tax agent before you act.
Building a store that handles returns properly?
We build stores with a clear returns page, return request forms and order emails designed in. See our web design service →
First, this short KPDN video explains how consumers claim compensation at the Consumer Claims Tribunal, which is where most refund disputes end up.
Source video: KPDN on YouTube. Published February 2022 (in Bahasa Malaysia).
Quick Answer: The Consumer Protection Act 1999 does not give buyers a general right to return goods they simply no longer want. Refund duties are triggered when goods fail one of the Act’s implied guarantees, such as acceptable quality or matching their description. Then the buyer can ask you to fix it, and in serious cases reject the goods for a refund or replacement.
The rules sit in Parts V and VI of the Consumer Protection Act 1999 (Act 599), enforced by KPDN. Three ideas shape every refund policy in Malaysia:
For an online store, “matches its description” carries the most weight: your photos, size charts and listing copy are the description. Our guide to building an e-commerce website in Malaysia covers the basics.
Quick Answer: When a fault can be fixed, you may repair or replace first, and refund only if neither is reasonable (section 42). When the failure is substantial, such as goods a buyer would never have bought had they known, or goods that are unsafe, the buyer may reject them and choose a refund or replacement (sections 44 and 46).
Here is how the common situations an online store sees map against the Act.
| Situation | Remedy required by law? | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Item arrives broken or faulty | Yes: repair, replace or refund | Act 599 s32, s41, s42 |
| Wrong item, size or colour sent | Yes, and you pay re-delivery | s34; e-trade Regulations 2024, reg 5 |
| Item differs a lot from photos or listing | Yes; buyer may reject for refund | s34, s44(b), s46 |
| Item is unsafe | Yes; counts as substantial failure | s32, s44(d) |
| Paid service not done with reasonable care | Yes: fix, or buyer may cancel | s53, s60 |
| Buyer changed their mind | No, unless your policy offers it | No general right in Act 599 |
| Buyer damaged it after delivery | No right to reject | s43(1)(d) |
Source: ZenWeb reading of Act 599 (Parts V, VI, VIII and IX) and P.U. (A) 449/2024. Simplified; facts decide each case. As at October 2026. Licence.
Section 43 ends the right to reject after a “reasonable time”, judged by the type of goods and how long a defect takes to show. The Act sets no fixed number of days, so a “7-day return window” covers change-of-mind returns only. It cannot cut off a buyer whose blender fails in week three.
Wrong-item disputes are common: KPDN told Berita RTM in January 2025 that online purchases were a top complaint type among 47,249 complaints in 2024.
Quick Answer: Not as a blanket rule. Section 6 says the Act applies “notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any agreement”, and a supplier who tries to contract out of it commits an offence. “No refund” can lawfully cover change-of-mind returns, but not faulty, unsafe or misdescribed goods.
Two parts of Act 599 work against blanket refusals:
So use the honest version: “We do not accept change-of-mind returns. Faulty, damaged or wrong items will be repaired, replaced or refunded in line with the Consumer Protection Act 1999.” It protects your margins and your buyers’ rights, and a fair policy also eases the checkout doubts behind cart abandonment. Write your own wording rather than copying a rival’s page; see what the Copyright Act lets marketers reuse online.
Quick Answer: Only for refunds you give voluntarily. When a buyer lawfully rejects goods, section 46 lets them choose a refund or replacement, and says a refund “cannot be satisfied by permitting the consumer to acquire other goods”. Sections 42(3) and 46(2) define a refund as cash of the money paid. Store credit is fine for change-of-mind returns.
Vouchers work for goodwill returns, not legal ones. A simple split for your policy page:
| Return type | Store credit allowed? | What to write |
|---|---|---|
| Change of mind | Yes | “14-day returns get store credit.” |
| Faulty, fixable | Repair or replace first | “We repair or replace, or refund if we cannot.” |
| Rejected (substantial failure) | No, buyer’s choice | “Choose a full refund or a replacement.” |
Refunds also touch e-invoicing: a cash refund needs a refund note, not a credit note (see e-invoice credit notes for online refunds). If you consolidate web orders monthly, check the consolidated e-invoice RM10,000 rule too.
Want a returns flow that triggers the right refund automatically?
We set up return request forms, refund emails and payment gateway refunds on your store. Check our web design pricing →
Quick Answer: For wrong or defective goods, the seller. Regulation 5 of the Consumer Protection (Electronic Trade Transaction) Regulations 2024 says an online seller must “bear the cost of re-delivery” when goods are materially different or defective. For change-of-mind returns, who pays postage is your policy choice, as long as you state it clearly.
The 2024 e-trade Regulations (P.U. (A) 449) have applied since 25 December 2024. Under section 45 of Act 599, rejected goods too costly to send back, such as bulky furniture, are collected by the seller.
| Return reason | Return postage | Re-delivery of correct item | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wrong item sent | Seller | Seller | Reg 5(a); ZenWeb reading for return leg |
| Defective on arrival | Seller | Seller | Reg 5(a); Act 599 s41(2) |
| Bulky item rejected | Seller collects | Seller, if replacement chosen | Act 599 s45(2)(a) |
| Change of mind | Your policy (often buyer) | Not applicable | No statutory rule |
Source: P.U. (A) 449/2024 reg 5 and Act 599 s41 and s45; return-leg reading is ZenWeb’s, confirm with your lawyer. Blue = seller pays; amber = your choice. As at October 2026. Licence.
Regulation 5 names re-delivery, not the return leg. We read section 41(2), which lets buyers claim losses caused by the failure, as covering return postage too, but the law does not spell this out. The same 2024 rules set the other items your store must show; see e-commerce website legal requirements in Malaysia.
Quick Answer: The buyer can file a claim of up to RM50,000 with the Tribunal for Consumer Claims Malaysia (TTPM) within three years of the cause of action (sections 98 and 99). Since November 2025 they can file, upload evidence and track the case online. The Tribunal can void unfair terms, so a harsh refund policy rarely helps you.
The figures that frame a refund dispute, taken from Act 599:
| Limit | Amount | Relative size |
|---|---|---|
| Max fine, company, repeat offence (s145) | RM200,000 | |
| Max fine, company, first offence (s145) | RM100,000 | |
| Max fine, individual, first offence (s145) | RM50,000 and/or 3 years | |
| Max Tribunal award per claim (s98) | RM50,000 |
Source: Act 599, sections 98(1) and 145(1) to (2). Fines are maximums for offences such as contracting out (s6), not typical outcomes. As at October 2026. Licence.
KPDN’s ez-TTPM system, reported by Berita RTM on 22 November 2025, lets buyers lodge claims through the official TTPM portal without visiting an office. Keep ready your dated policy as it stood at the order, plus confirmation emails, delivery proof, chat logs and packing photos.
A refused refund often becomes a one-star review too. Never trade a refund for deleting or improving a review; see the legal risks of buying Google reviews.
Quick Answer: The core guarantees date from 1999. Unfair-terms rules arrived in 2011, the Tribunal limit rose to RM50,000 after the 2019 amendment, the 2024 e-trade Regulations put re-delivery costs on online sellers, and online Tribunal filing arrived in 2025. A refund page written before 2025 probably misses the newest duty.
| Date | Change | What it means for your refund page |
|---|---|---|
| 1999 | Consumer Protection Act 1999 passed | Implied guarantees and cash refunds on rejection |
| 1 Feb 2011 | Part IIIA unfair terms in force (Act A1381) | Harsh exclusion clauses can be declared void |
| Jul 2019 | Tribunal limit raised from RM25,000 to RM50,000 (reported) | Bigger orders can go to the Tribunal |
| 25 Dec 2024 | E-trade Regulations 2024 in force | Seller pays re-delivery for wrong or defective goods |
| Nov 2025 | ez-TTPM online claims launched | Claims are easier to file from anywhere |
| Oct 2026 | KPDN still finalising a new e-commerce law | Pending: review your page when it is passed |
Source: ZenWeb compilation from Act 599 (amendment list), P.U. (A) 449/2024, Berita Harian via KPDN repository (July 2019) and Berita RTM (November 2025). As at October 2026. Licence.
The 2019 increase was reported by Berita Harian, archived by KPDN, and section 98 now reads RM50,000. The new e-commerce Act has no date as at October 2026, so its refund rules remain unknown.
Quick Answer: A compliant refund policy in Malaysia separates legal returns from goodwill returns, explains how to report a problem, says who pays postage, gives a refund timeline and method, and lists genuine exclusions. Link it at checkout, since the 2024 Regulations require your terms of sale to be shown to buyers.
Use this order when you write or rebuild the page:
Marketing promises count as terms too. A “30-day money-back guarantee” in an ad must be honoured as stated; check it against KPDN rules for sale and discount ads, since misleading claims can be reported to ASA Malaysia. If creators mention your returns, fix the wording in the influencer contract and follow influencer disclosure rules in Malaysia.
Promotions need a refund line as well: say what happens to a contest entry or referral reward when the purchase is returned. See the 10 clauses contest terms should include, when a lucky draw becomes illegal and referral rewards under Malaysia’s anti-pyramid law.
Quick Answer: Take a small Shah Alam store selling cushions and lamps on its own site. Its old refund policy said “No refund, no exchange. Store credit only. Buyer pays return postage.” Each line must change for faulty or wrong items, though the store can keep them for change-of-mind returns.
This is an illustrative example, not a real client.
| Old line | Problem | New line |
|---|---|---|
| “No refund, no exchange” | Contracts out of Act 599 (s6) | “No change-of-mind returns on sale items. Faulty items are covered by law.” |
| “Store credit only” | Breaches s46(3) on rejected goods | “Store credit for change of mind; refund or replacement for faulty items.” |
| “Buyer pays return postage” | Conflicts with reg 5 | “We collect wrong or faulty items free.” |
The store also added a return request form to its order emails and turned on refunds in its gateway. If yours cannot do quick partial refunds, see choosing a payment gateway in Malaysia. Return forms collect names, addresses and photos, so cover them in your website privacy policy under the PDPA.
Check your refund policy in Malaysia against this list, and again whenever the law or your store changes:
A clear refund policy in Malaysia does more than avoid a Tribunal claim: it answers the buyer’s last question before they pay.
No law names a refund policy page, but the 2024 e-trade Regulations require online sellers to show their terms of sale, and returns are part of those terms. Every online store should publish one.
No. The Consumer Protection Act 1999 has no general change-of-mind right. If you offer one, the terms you publish bind you.
No fixed number. Section 43 allows a reasonable time, judged by the type of goods and when a defect would normally appear.
ZenWeb builds the website side: returns page, return forms, checkout links and refund emails. Have a licensed lawyer confirm the wording.
Get an online store with returns that build trust
Talk to ZenWeb about a store with a clear returns page, return request forms and refund-ready checkout built in. We handle the website; your lawyer handles the legal advice.
Complete the form and our team will contact you to discuss your goals. Let’s grow your business.
Tell us a little about what you need. We'll open WhatsApp with your message ready to send.