Most Malaysian advertisers set up their sitelinks once, during the first week of the account, and never look at them again. Two years later the ad still points at a promotion that ended in 2024.
That is a shame, because Google Ads assets are the cheapest performance lever in a search account. They cost nothing and don’t change your bid. What they change is the physical size of your ad on the results page — and on mobile, where one ad can fill most of the first screen, size is close to everything.
This guide covers which Google Ads assets actually move click-through rate in Malaysian accounts, how many you need before returns flatten, and the cases where an asset quietly makes things worse. Four datasets from ZenWeb-managed accounts sit underneath it. If you’re still deciding whether to run search in-house, our breakdown of what an SEM package really covers is a useful companion, and ZenWeb manages this layer for over 500 Malaysian businesses.
Before the detail, here’s a full walkthrough of the asset setup inside a live account.
Source video: Google Ads Assets (Extensions) Setup in 2025 - FULL Tutorial on YouTube
Quick Answer: An asset is any extra element attached to your ad that isn’t a headline or description — sitelinks, callouts, structured snippets, images, call buttons, locations, prices, promotions and lead forms. Google renamed extensions to assets in 2022. They’re free to add and sit at account, campaign or ad group level, as our Google Ads management service configures on every account.
The rename mattered more than it looked. “Extension” implied an optional bolt-on. “Asset” put these elements in the same bucket as headlines and descriptions — components Google assembles at auction time, choosing whichever combination it predicts will perform best.
Google Ads assets split into two groups that behave very differently:
Google’s guidance in its documentation on adding assets is to set Google Ads assets at account level first, then override lower down where the message needs to be narrower. That hierarchy has a trap in it: a single callout at ad group level blocks every campaign-level callout from serving. One careless override can silently switch off work you did months ago.
Not sure which assets are live in your account?
We audit asset coverage before quoting, so you see the gaps rather than a guess. See our Google Ads pricing →
Quick Answer: Sitelinks with descriptions produce the largest click lift in Malaysian search accounts, followed by image assets and promotion assets. Callouts and structured snippets add far less individually. None of them lift anything if they never serve, which is why breadth beats polish — a point our guide to fixing low CTR on Google Ads develops further.
The figures below compare the same ad’s click-through rate when an asset type served against when it did not — isolating the asset rather than the ad.
| Asset type | Relative CTR lift | Where the lift comes from |
|---|---|---|
| Sitelinks with descriptions | +18% | Ad height, plus a second reason to click |
| Image assets | +14% | Visual break in a wall of blue text |
| Promotion assets | +12% | Price tag renders as a distinct badge |
| Call asset (mobile) | +11% | Removes a step for phone-first buyers |
| Callouts | +9% | One extra line; no click target |
| Location asset | +7% | Only where proximity matters to the buyer |
| Structured snippets | +5% | Reads as a list; rarely the deciding factor |
| Price assets | +4% | Filters out browsers, so clicks fall in quality terms |
Source: ZenWeb client sample, 500+ Malaysian SME accounts, 2024–2026. Licence.
Read the bottom of that table carefully. Price assets show the smallest CTR lift, and that is the point of them. Publishing a starting price removes people who were never going to pay it. Fewer clicks, better clicks — the same trade-off we describe in the levers that cut cost per click. So “which Google Ads assets work” depends on whether you are measuring clicks or customers.
Sitelinks with descriptions lift click-through rate roughly four times more than structured snippets — and take about the same ten minutes to write.
Quick Answer: Sitelinks are the only asset that both enlarges your ad and gives the searcher a different destination. Google shows up to six on desktop and eight on mobile, and needs at least two to display any. Descriptions unlock the taller format, which is why they matter more than the link text itself in a well-built search campaign structure.
Google’s documentation on sitelink assets is unusually direct about the numbers. It states that advertisers who raise the number of sitelinks per campaign to six see, on average, up to 3.5% more conversions at a similar cost per conversion. It also reports that advertisers who move Ad Strength for responsive search ads and sitelinks from “Poor” to “Excellent” see 15% more conversions on average.
Those are Google’s internal figures, so read them as directional. They match what we see, though: accounts with six well-described sitelinks are rarely the accounts with a CTR problem.
Four things decide whether your sitelinks earn their place:
The last point is where most Malaysian accounts leak value. “Contact Us”, “About Us”, “Our Services” and “Home” is a navigation bar, not a set of sitelinks. “Price list”, “Same-day service in KL”, “Free site visit” and “Warranty terms” are four different reasons to click. They also need four pages that answer those promises, which is a landing page problem before it is an asset problem.
Quick Answer: Returns rise sharply from one to five asset types, then flatten. Campaigns running five or six types show assets on roughly three-quarters of impressions, against about four in ten for campaigns running one or two. Beyond seven types the extra gain is small, though it costs nothing to keep going.
Google’s advice in its note on using as many asset types as possible is to add every eligible one and let the system choose. The data below shows why breadth in your Google Ads assets works — and where it stops paying.
| Live asset types | Impressions showing an asset | CTR index | Typical account |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 types | 41% | 100 | Set up once, never revisited |
| 3–4 types | 63% | 112 | Sitelinks and callouts only |
| 5–6 types | 78% | 124 | Managed account, quarterly review |
| 7+ types | 84% | 128 | Everything eligible switched on |
Source: ZenWeb-managed Malaysian search campaigns, 2025–2026. CTR indexed to the 1–2 type group. Licence.
The jump from two types to five is worth about a quarter of your click-through rate. The jump from five to seven is worth another four points. Both are free, but only one is worth a weekend.
There is a budget angle too. Higher CTR at the same bid usually means better Ad Rank and a lower actual cost per click, which stretches a fixed monthly budget further. If your spend runs out before month-end, widening your Google Ads assets is a cheaper fix to try before touching bids — alongside proper budget pacing.
Quick Answer: Use callouts for single benefits — “Free site visit”, “24-hour response”. Use structured snippets to list a complete category — all your service types, all your brands. Callouts are flexible and short; snippets need at least three values under a fixed header. Most Malaysian accounts should run both, because neither competes for the other’s space.
The two get confused constantly, so here is the practical difference.
| Dimension | Callout | Structured snippet |
|---|---|---|
| What it says | One benefit, standalone | A complete list under a header |
| Minimum to run | Two | Three values |
| Character limit | 25 per callout | 25 per value |
| Clickable | No | No |
| Best use | Objection handling | Showing range |
Google’s page on callout assets notes that up to ten callouts can show depending on device and spacing, and advises keeping text short so more fit. Its page on structured snippet assets is explicit that a snippet should describe a complete group of products or services, not a single selling point.
For Malaysian advertisers, the most useful callouts answer a local hesitation: “No deposit required”, “SST included”, “Serving Klang Valley”, “Malay & English support”. Generic phrases like “Best quality” get ignored by everyone, including Google’s serving algorithm.
Want a second pair of eyes on your ad copy?
An asset review usually takes an hour and shows up in the numbers within a fortnight. Compare consultant and agency options →
Quick Answer: Most Malaysian buyers want to message, not ring, yet the call asset points at a landline nobody answers after 6pm. Schedule call assets to your real operating hours, route to a mobile that takes WhatsApp, and pair them with a sticky call button on the landing page.
Malaysia is a messaging-first market. That creates a specific mismatch in how Google Ads assets get used here: the ad offers a call, the buyer wants a chat, and the enquiry evaporates in the gap.
Three fixes we apply on almost every account:
Service businesses with a physical catchment should also look at Google Local Services Ads, priced per lead rather than per click. They are a different product, not one of the Google Ads assets — but they compete for the same attention at the top of the page.
Quick Answer: Yes, in three ways. Sitelinks pointing at weak pages absorb clicks that would have gone to your best page. Automated assets can invent claims from outdated site copy. And on branded searches, extra links can send existing customers to support pages instead of the checkout.
The industry line is that Google Ads assets are free and can only help. That is true of the click, not of the outcome.
The clearest example is the branded search. Someone types your company name intending to buy. Your ad appears with six sitelinks, one of which says “Careers”. A share of those buyers now go looking at jobs. You paid the same per click and lost the sale — one reason the split between branded and non-branded keywords deserves its own campaign and its own asset set.
Automated assets carry a subtler risk. Google generates dynamic sitelinks and callouts from your website. If your site still advertises a promotion that closed, or a service you dropped, those phrases can appear under a live ad. Review the automated assets report monthly and pause anything that no longer reflects the business. Accounts running Google Ads scripts can flag new automated assets instead of relying on memory.
A third case: lead form assets collect contacts who never expected a phone call, because the form appears before the buyer has read anything. That is a real risk in B2B search advertising, where the qualifying step is the point.
Paying for clicks that go to the wrong page?
We check every sitelink destination as part of the monthly account review. See how campaign management works →
Quick Answer: Sitelink serving has stayed roughly flat since 2022, callout serving has slipped, and image and automated assets have climbed steeply. The practical read: Google now fills ad space with whatever it generates itself when you leave a gap, so the gaps are where you lose control.
The table below tracks how often each asset family served on Malaysian search impressions across ZenWeb-managed accounts.
| Asset family | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sitelinks | 64% | 66% | 65% | 67% | 68% |
| Callouts | 58% | 55% | 51% | 47% | 44% |
| Image assets | 9% | 17% | 24% | 31% | 36% |
| Automated assets | 21% | 30% | 39% | 48% | 55% |
Source: ZenWeb-managed Malaysian search accounts, 2022–2026. Licence.
Callout serving has fallen by roughly a quarter over four years while automated assets have more than doubled. Those two lines describe the same shift: Google fills ad space with its own material where advertisers leave their Google Ads assets thin.
Microsoft’s network shows a similar pattern with a lag, worth factoring in if you’re weighing up Microsoft Advertising in Malaysia as a second channel.
Quick Answer: Asset priority changes by industry. Clinics and home services get most of their lift from call and location assets. Property and F&B lean on image assets. B2B and professional services get almost everything from sitelinks, because the buyer is comparing depth rather than reacting to a photo.
The rows below split each industry’s CTR lift from Google Ads assets across four asset families, so each row sums to 100%.
| Industry | Sitelinks | Call + location | Image | Text (callout, snippet) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinics and dental | 26% | 44% | 16% | 14% |
| Home services | 24% | 48% | 13% | 15% |
| Property | 29% | 21% | 39% | 11% |
| F&B and retail | 19% | 27% | 42% | 12% |
| B2B and professional | 52% | 18% | 9% | 21% |
| Education and training | 41% | 24% | 17% | 18% |
Source: ZenWeb client tracking across six Malaysian industries, 2024–2026. Rows sum to 100%. Licence.
The pattern follows the buying decision. Where the buyer is choosing between nearby providers for something urgent, call and location assets carry the weight. Where they need to see the options, images do. Where they evaluate credibility over weeks, sitelinks do — the only asset that can show depth.
Quick Answer: Write six sitelinks with descriptions, add image assets, schedule the call asset to real hours, run callouts and snippets for coverage, and review automated assets monthly. That takes an afternoon and is the cheapest CTR gain available in Google Ads management.
Google Ads assets reward attention rather than cleverness. The accounts that do well aren’t running secret asset types; they run six of them, check every quarter, and point them at pages that still exist.
The direction of travel is clear. Google fills unused ad space with material it writes itself, and that share keeps growing. Writing your own Google Ads assets is now less about a few extra clicks and more about keeping control of what your ad says. For the wider context, our overview of what search engine marketing services cover sets assets in the full campaign picture.
Ready to get more from the same ad budget?
Book a free 30-minute strategy session. We’ll review your asset coverage, your ad copy and your competitors, then give you a concrete 90-day plan with realistic CPL and lead targets.
There is no functional difference. Google renamed ad extensions to assets in 2022 to reflect that these elements are assembled into the ad alongside headlines and descriptions rather than bolted on. Older guides still say “extensions”; both terms cover sitelinks, callouts, images, call buttons and the rest.
No. Adding assets is free, and a click on a sitelink costs the same as a click on your headline. You won’t be charged for more than two clicks per ad impression. The only cost is the time to write them and the discipline to keep them current.
At least six per campaign, with descriptions filled in, created at account level first. Google needs two to show any, displays up to six on desktop and eight on mobile, and picks whichever combination it predicts will perform best. Keep every sitelink text unique — near-duplicates won’t serve together.
Not directly. Quality Score is built from expected click-through rate, ad relevance and landing page experience. Assets aren’t a separate input, but by raising click-through rate they can improve the expected CTR component over time, and they feed Ad Strength. See our guide on improving Quality Score.
Usually no. Automated assets now serve on more than half of Malaysian search impressions and add coverage you would otherwise lose. Review the automated assets report monthly and pause individual ones referencing expired promotions, dropped services or outdated pricing, rather than switching the category off.
Complete the form and our team will contact you to discuss your goals. Let’s grow your business.

Online